Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Komparatif Hukum Positif dan Konsep Diyat Hukum Islam

Authors

  • Sulastryani Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andi Djemma, Indonesia Author
  • Nasrah Hasmiati Attas Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mega Buana Palopo, Indonesia Author
  • Suriyani Sosiologi Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, UIN Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia Author
  • Chece Djafar Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Andi Djemma, Indonesia Author
  • Herman Saputra Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Andi Djemma, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66277/sejals.1.2.71

Keywords:

Restorative Justice , Diyat, Hukum Pidana Islam, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Perlindungan Korban, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana

Abstract

Retributive punishment has shown its limits, prompting victim-oriented justice built on offender accountability, reparation, and social reconciliation. In Indonesia, restorative justice has been institutionalized through Attorney General Regulation No. 15 of 2020, National Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, and Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code. However, its normative relationship with victim compensation in Islamic criminal jurisprudence remains underexplored. This study examines restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system through a comparison with the Islamic concept of diyat. Using normative legal research, it applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings show that both frameworks share principles of victim protection, offender accountability, compensation, and restoration of social relations, yet differ in legal structure and the position of victims. Restorative justice depends on statutory requirements and institutional discretion, whereas diyat is a normatively recognized compensation, with 'afwu (forgiveness) as the basis for reconciliation. The study argues that diyat can strengthen substantive restitution and victim participation in Indonesia's criminal justice reform.

References

Ahyar, Djuniarti, E., Muhaimin, Kristiyanto, E. N., Nurdin, R., & Abubakar, A. (2021). Legitimation of Qanun in the Indonesian Law System. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020), 549. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210506.048

Aprilianda, N., Farikhah, M., & Krisna, L. A. (2022). Critical Review Selecting a Proper Law to Resolve Sexual Violence Against Children in Indonesia. Samarah, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.9050

Arifin, Z., Al-Ansori, H., Febriana, M., & Puspitasar, R. (2024). Formulasi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penguntitan Perspektif HAM. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2(4), 30–47.

Arsyad, M., & Basri, A. (2024). Traditional and modern maritime economic systems in Indonesia. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah, 8(3), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v8i3.36587

Aulia, Y., Abdurahman, A., & Susanto, M. (2021). FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE LEGISLATION PROCESS. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v6i1.109

Aziz, S. (2014). KANUNISASI FIKIH JINAYAT KONTEMPORER Studi Materi Muatan Qānūn Jināyat Aceh dan Brunei Darussalam. Al-Ahkam, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2014.24.2.145

Dewi Iriani, Muhammad Fauzan, Ayu Hudzaifah, Joe Rey Acob, & Daffa Maulidio Inzaghi. (2025). Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines. Jurnal Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v15i1.8716

Fadhil, M. (2023). Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia : The Perspective on Freedom of Expression and Opinion. Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2023.9.2.128-146

Faiz, P. M. (2016). Dimensi Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dimensions of Judicial Activism In. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(2).

Hamdi, S., M. Ikhwan, M. I., & Iskandar, I. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Implementasi Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v1i1.603

Handayani, F. A., & Ichsana, M. (2023). Reorientasi Kebijakan Pemidanaan dalam KUHP Baru: Analisis Terhadap Paradigma Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan.

Jackson, V. C. (2015). Constitutional law in an age of proportionality. Yale Law Journal, 124(8).

Jourdani, G. B., Sanusi, & Bhaliq, R. R. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Muslim Dalam Mendapatkan Jaminan Produk Halal Atas Transaksi secara Online. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen (JURBISMAN).

Marsudin Nainggolan. (2025). Transformasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam KUHP Baru. Dandapala.

Mukhlishin, M., & Sarip, S. (2020). KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM: MENYOAL KONSEP KEADILAN HUKUM HANS KELSEN PERSPEKTIF “AL-‘ADL” DALAM AL-QUR’AN. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v11i1.1954

Nur, M., Salda, M., & Hamdani, H. (2021). The Politics of Criminal Law on The Protection of Rape Victims Based on the Qanun of Jinayah in Aceh. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i2.20311

Pally, H. (2024). Integrasi Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Tumou Tou Law Review. https://doi.org/10.35801/tourev.v3i1.48170

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Direktorat Utama Pembinaan Dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, (16100), 1–345.

Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Putri Relina, R., Sakti, A., & Tolapa, M. (2025). Digital regulatory dynamics and criminal justice reforms. Geoforum, 158, 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103892

Sakti, A., Arsyad, M., & Hasniah, H. (2026). Legal protection and victim restitution in criminal justice. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103120

Sandoval, E. B., & Kornelis, Y. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019: Hancurkan Independensi KPK? Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i1.6732

Satriawan, I., & Lailam, T. (2019). Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636

Setiawan, M. N., & Afita, C. O. Y. (2025). Reformasi Sistem Hukum Pidana Melalui Kuhp Baru: Tantangan Dan Peluang Menuju Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen.

Suniehin, S. (2022). Law and morality: problems of interaction in the context of modern realities. Yearly Journal of Scientific Articles “Pravova Derzhava,” (33). https://doi.org/10.33663/1563-3349-2022-33-186-197

Trini Hastuti, L. (2023). Navigating Legal Boundaries: A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison of Qanun Jinayat on Non-Muslims in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v21i2.5339

Widowati, W. (2025). Criminal Law and Juvenile Delinquency: An Analysis of Legal Approaches to Juvenile Offenders. Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1172

Zainuddin, M., Mubarok, Z., & Bachriani, R. D. (2022). Politik Hukum Restorative Justice Dalam. Semarang Law Review (SLR).

Zuhayli, W. (2002). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh (Fiqh Jinayah). Dar al-Fikr.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12